Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Palliative Care Workers: An International Cross-sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to mitigate spread have affected countries in different ways. Healthcare workers, in particular, have been impacted by the pandemic and by these measures. This study aims to explore how COVID-19 has impacted on palliative care (PC) workers around the world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online survey to members of the International Association for Hospice and PC during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Convenience sampling was used. Statistical descriptive and contingency analyses and Chi-square tests with P < 0.05 were conducted. RESULTS: Seventy-nine participants (RR = 16%) from 41 countries responded. Over 93% of those who provide direct patient care reported feeling very or somewhat competent in PC provision for patients with COVID-19. Eighty-four felt unsafe or somewhat safe when caring for patients with COVID-19. Level of safety was associated with competence (P ≤ 0.000). Over 80% reported being highly or somewhat affected in their ability to continue working in their PC job, providing care to non-COVID patients and in staff availability in their workplace. About 37% reported that availability and access to essential medicines for PC were highly or somewhat affected, more so in low-income countries (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The results from this study highlight the impact of COVID-19 on the provision of PC. It is incumbent on government officials, academia, providers and affected populations, to develop and implement strategies to integrate PC in pandemic response, and preparedness for any similar future events, by providing appropriate and comprehensive education, uninterrupted access to essential medicines and personal protective equipment and ensure access to treatment and care, working together with all levels of society that is invested in care of individuals and populations at large. The long-term effects of the pandemic are still unknown and future research is needed to monitor and report on the appropriateness of measures.

The impact of COVID-19 on palliative care workers across the world: A qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions.

OBJECTIVE: With over two million deaths and almost 100 million confirmed cases, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a "tsunami of suffering." Health care workers, including palliative care workers, have been severely impacted. This study explores how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted palliative care workers around the world and describes the coping strategies they have adopted to face their specific situation. METHOD: We conducted a qualitative analysis of written, unstructured comments provided by respondents to a survey of IAHPC members between May and June 2020. Free text was exported to MAX QDA, and a thematic analysis was performed by reading the comments and developing a coding frame. RESULTS: Seventy-seven palliative care workers from 41 countries submitted at least one written comment, resulting in a data corpus of 10,694 words and a total of 374 coded comments. Eight main themes are emerged from the analysis: palliative care development, workforce impact, work reorganization, palliative care reconceptualization, economic and financial impacts, increased risk, emotional impact, and coping strategies. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The pandemic has had a huge impact on palliative care workers including their ability to work and their financial status. It has generated increased workloads and placed them in vulnerable positions that affect their emotional well-being, resulting in distress and burnout. Counseling and support networks provide important resilience-building buffers. Coping strategies such as team and family support are important factors in workers' capacity to adapt and respond. The pandemic is changing the concept and praxis of palliative care. Government officials, academia, providers, and affected populations need to work together to develop, and implement steps to ensure palliative care integration into response preparedness plans so as not to leave anyone behind, including health workers.

Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli-A poorly appreciated enteric pathogen: Systematic review.

Non-O157 strains of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are more common causes of acute diarrhea than the better-known O157 strains and have the potential for large outbreaks. This systematic review of the literature identified 129 serogroups as well as 262 different O and H antigen combinations of STEC in cases of epidemic and sporadic disease worldwide. Excluding the results from a single large outbreak of STEC O104:H4 in Germany and France in 2011, the reported frequency of dysenteric illness in patients was 26% (119 of 464) for epidemic disease and 25% (646 of 2588) for sporadic cases. Hemolytic uremic syndrome was identified in 14% of epidemic disease cases and 9% of sporadic illness cases. With the increasing use of PCR-based diagnostics, STEC strain identification may not be possible. Rapid diagnostics are needed for STEC infections to aid the clinician while allowing epidemiologists the opportunity to identify outbreaks and to trace the source of infection.

Translational research will fail without surgical leadership: SCOTRRCC a successful surgeon-led Nationwide translational research infrastructure in renal cancer.

BACKGROUND: High quality human biosamples with associated high quality clinical data are essential for successful translational research. Despite this, the traditional approach is for the surgeon to act as a technician in the tissue collection act. Biomarker research presents multiple challenges and the field is littered with failures. Tissue quality, poor clinical information, small sample numbers and lack of validation cohorts are just a few reasons for failure. It is clear that the surgeon involved in tissue acquisition must be fully engaged in the process of biosampling for a specific condition, as this will negate many of the issues for translational research failure due to an inadequate bioresource. APPROACH: In this Matter for Debate paper, the Scottish Collaboration On Translational Research into Renal Cell Cancer (SCOTRRCC) is discussed as an example of a urological surgery lead bioresource which has resulted in a National collection of renal cancer tissue and blood (from over 900 patients to date), negating all of the traditional issues with biobanks because of close enagagement and acknowledgement of urologists and uropathologists from seven centres around Scotland. SCOTRRCC has leveraged renal cancer research in Scotland resulting in several high impact publications and providing a springboard for future research in this disease in Scotland and beyond. CONCLUSIONS: The SCOTRRCC model presented here can be transferred to other surgical disciplines for success in translational research.

A preliminary study of silicone hydrogel lens material and care solution bioincompatibilities.

PURPOSE: The study purpose was to evaluate corneal barrier function and staining relative to potential bioincompatibilities. METHODS: This was a randomized double-masked study (n = 25 subjects). Three lens material-care solution combinations were tested: (1) lotrafilcon B/polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-based multipurpose (MPS) solution (MPS-1); (2) lotrafilcon B/polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine-based solution (MPS-2); and (3) lotrafilcon B and another PHMB-based solution (MPS-3). Saline served as the control. New lenses were soaked in the preserved solutions or saline and then worn for 2 hours before corneal measurements. Barrier function was characterized by the fluorescein penetration rate, corneal amount, both measured with an objective scanning fluorometer. The dye penetration rate ratio, test to control; amount ratio, test to control, and corneal staining were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean rate ratios (± SD) for the combinations were 2.98 (± 3.04), 1.23 (± 1.01), and 1.83 (± 1.77) for MPS-1, MPS-2, and MPS-3 solutions, respectively. Significant ratio differences were found across regimens (P = 0.007); for MPS-1 compared with baseline (P = 0.031) and for MPS-1 compared with MPS-2 (P = 0.007). The statistical results for staining were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an objective quantitative physiological method suggests that significant differences in lens solution bioincompatibilities occur that mirror corneal staining data relative to corneal compromise.